As the US walks away from Ukraine and seeks a deal with Russia, Europe has to put its money where its mouth is and therein lies the problem, says international security expert Stefan Wolff.
As the US walks away from Ukraine and seeks a deal with Russia , Europe has to put its money where its mouth is and therein lies the problem, says international security expert Stefan Wolff. File photo.
Daily newspapers with covers, dedicated to the recent phone call of Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump, are laid out at a newsstand in a street in Moscow, Russia, Feb 13, 2025. BIRMINGHAM: The last week has left European leaders in little doubt that they will be mostly on their own when it comes to Ukraine.on the future of the country, in the absence of both Ukraine itself and Europe. And make no mistake, it will be a deal that looks, at least in the short term, more like a victory for Russian President Vladimir Putin. These are worrying prospects to begin with - and a real nightmare scenario for Europe. The continent is ill-prepared to step up and into a future without a significant US security presence. Since the end of World War II, America’s presence has kept allies in Europe safe via the North Atlantic Treaty Organization - first from Soviet then Russian aggression. For these past 80 years, the bill for European security has mostly been footed by Washington - to the displeasure of US President Donald Trump.- despite significant increases - is still dwarfed by America’s. The US committed over US$900 billion in 2024, while Germany is Europe’s largest defence spender with less than US$90 billion. The story is similar when it comes to combat-ready forces. Poland has the largest standing army among EU member states with around 200,000 soldiers, only half of whom are land forces that would be critical for bothYet, Poland has already ruled out sending troops to Ukraine. Other EU countries, including Germany, Spain and Denmark, have been more circumspect about whether they would be willing to put boots on the ground in Ukraine. By contrast, the clearest commitment so far to contribute ground forces to secure a ceasefire has come from outside the EU. However, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has not yet given any details about the troops he is prepared to commit to Ukraine. And with the size of the British army now below 80,000 soldiers and reportedly fewer than 20,000 ready to deploy in combat, he will be hard-pressed to deploy them in significant numbers.Commentary: With Trump back in office, the world can no longer free-ride on American goodwill The necessity to step up and assume greater responsibility for its own security has been recognised by European leaders for some time now. Their increasing determination to do something about it was also evident at a meeting hastily arranged by French President Emmanuel Macron on Monday in Paris.Necessity and willingness to one side, Europe’s ability to act, however, remains in doubt. The meeting in Paris, much like a joint statement last week by the so-called Weimar+ group is indicative of how divided Europe is becoming over what course to chart between Russia and the US. There is an emerging “coalition of the willing” who are determined to invest in the continent’s defences to deter Russia from future aggression and provide Ukraine with badly needed security guarantees. This coalition shapes up to be a mix of the Weimar+ group, those countries and institutions invited to the emergency meeting in Paris on Monday and NATO’s other Baltic member states. French President Emmanuel Macron welcomes Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer as he arrives for a meeting with European leaders on Ukraine and European security at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, Feb 17, 2025. Potentially, this is a formidable alliance. But as the debate over the commitment to ground forces already indicates, this coalition is far from a unitary force. And even if they were, their ability to act fast and decisively is hampered by the financial constraints they face. Several countries are highly indebted, including France, Italy and Spain which have a government debt greater than its country’s gross domestic product. Germany, on the other hand, has a debt brake in place that prevents the federal government from exceeding an annual borrowing limit of 0.35 per cent of GDP. While temporary emergency exemptions are possible , changing this permanently to enable sustained higher defence spending would require a constitutional amendment. With many European countries domestically constrained to increase their military budgets, the alternative would be a new common European debt to finance the estimated €500 billion investment needed in the continent’s defence-industrial base over the next decade. Yet, common borrowing is anathema to many of the fiscally more conservative northern European members.As the saying goes, where there is a will, there is a way. And Europe now more than ever needs to find a way. The time for muddling through with temporary fixes to deep structural problems is well and truly over given that the ultimate US backstop to European security seems to be disappearing before our eyes. A US-Russia deal on Ukraine is above all a deal on the future European security order. Kyiv and Brussels may not be in the room when Mr Putin and Mr Trump strike their bargain, but the more common strength they can muster, the less exposed they will be when that deal turns out to be nothing more than a prelude to Russia’s next aggression. Stefan Wolff is Professor of International Security at the University of Birmingham and Head of the Department of Political Science and International Studies. We know it's a hassle to switch browsers but we want your experience with CNA to be fast, secure and the best it can possibly be.
Russia Russia-Ukraine War United States European Union
Singapore Latest News, Singapore Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Trump Threatens Sanctions on Russia if Putin Doesn't Negotiate Ukraine WarFormer US President Donald Trump indicated his willingness to impose sanctions on Russia if President Vladimir Putin refuses to engage in negotiations to end the ongoing war in Ukraine. Trump's statement came amidst concerns over the escalating conflict and the need for diplomatic solutions.
Read more »
Trump tells Putin to make Ukraine deal 'now' or face tougher sanctionsWASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump stepped up the pressure on Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin to make a peace deal with Ukraine Wednesday (Jan 22), threatening tougher economic measures if Moscow does not agree to end the war.
Read more »
Commentary: Trump’s ‘ridiculous war must end now’ warning to Putin is a surpriseNewly inaugurated US President Donald Trump seems to grasp, at last, that he can push not just Ukraine, but also Russia, to end the war, says professor of political science Robert Kelly.
Read more »
Trump Urges Putin to End Ukraine War, Hints at Past Nuclear DealFormer US President Donald Trump called for an end to the Russia-Ukraine conflict during a video address, expressing a desire to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin to achieve a peace settlement. Trump also alluded to past discussions about nuclear disarmament with Putin, claiming that Russia was receptive to reducing its nuclear arsenal.
Read more »
Trump Seeks Meeting with Putin to End Ukraine War, Cut Nuclear ArmsUS President Donald Trump expressed his desire to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin as soon as possible to broker a peace deal in the Ukraine war and work towards reducing nuclear arsenals. Trump emphasized the urgency of ending the conflict, citing the loss of millions of lives and the devastating consequences. He also stated that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is willing to negotiate a settlement.
Read more »
Trump Urges Putin to Make Ukraine Deal 'Now' or Face Tougher SanctionsFormer US President Donald Trump has issued a direct ultimatum to Russian President Vladimir Putin, demanding a peace deal in Ukraine be struck 'soon' or face escalating sanctions. Trump's statement, made on Truth Social, has been met with a mixed reaction in Russia, with some politicians and nationalists criticizing his approach as heavy-handed and counterproductive to peace negotiations.
Read more »