The Supreme Court Historical Society has raked in millions from corporations and lobbyists with cases before the court.
At least $6.4 million—or 60 percent—came from corporations, special interest groups, or lawyers and firms that argued cases before the court, according to an analysis of archived historical society newsletters and publicly available records that detail grants given to the society by foundations. Of that, at least $4.7 million came from individuals or entities in years when they had a pending interest in a federal court case on appeal or at the high court, records show.
In response to the new revelations, public interest attorney Steven Donziger, who was himself targeted by Chevron for his work aimed at holding the company to account for its polluting activities in Ecuador,Others quoted by thesaid the effort by people like Rev. Schenck, who admits to using the charitable group as a way to get other anti-abortion activists closer to the justices, creates a clear conflict of interest.
“It’s disgusting,” Fried said. “Many of the people who contribute have the same reasons I do. You go to a cocktail party and support a good cause. But it turns out that for some people it’s not that innocent.”notes that the Historical Society is “ostensibly independent of the judicial branch of government,” the reality is that “the two are inextricably intertwined,” with court justices serving as chair of the board and hosting gala events where exclusive access is reportedly part of the allure.
Singapore Latest News, Singapore Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Illinois Supreme Court halts plans to eliminate cash bail and other pretrial court changesControversial provision of SAFE-T Act paused by high court to 'maintain consistent pretrial procedures throughout Illinois'
Read more »
EPA finalizes contentious water rule despite pending case at U.S. Supreme CourtThe Biden administration on Friday finalized a rule protecting waterways that feed into rivers and lakes under the Clean Water Act, addressing a contentious question the U.S. Supreme Court is currently reviewing and restoring previous protections the Trump administration removed.
Read more »
Questions Raised About Charity Tied to Supreme CourtA report in 'The New York Times' is raising questions about a charity tied to the U.S. Supreme Court that has raked in millions—a significant chunk of it from entities with matters before the justices.
Read more »
Hundreds convicted by non-unanimous juries have right to new trial, Oregon Supreme Court rulesHundreds of defendants in Oregon who were convicted of crimes by non-unanimous juries before the U.S. Supreme Court struck down such jury verdicts have a right to a new trial, under a decision issued by the state's supreme court on Friday.
Read more »
Illinois Supreme Court halts implementation of cashless bailControversial provision of SAFE-T Act halted by state high court.
Read more »