I tested the Intel Core i9-14900K against the Core i9-13900K, and it’s not pretty

Singapore News News

I tested the Intel Core i9-14900K against the Core i9-13900K, and it’s not pretty
Singapore Latest News,Singapore Headlines
  • 📰 DigitalTrends
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 60 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 65%

Intel's new Core i9-14900K is the fastest desktop CPU from Team Blue, but is it worth upgrading from the Core i9-13900K? We break down the differences.

Intel’s new Core i9-14900K is a tough processor to evaluate. It brings the same number of cores and the same architecture as last-gen’s Core i9-13900K, but Intel asserts that the new chip delivers some performance improvements. Is that true, and is it worth ditching last-gen’s flagship for what Intel claims is its best processor?

The Core i9-14900K is listed at $590, but it’s already selling for more. As we’ve seen with Intel’s last two flagships, the Core i9-14900K will likely sell between $620 and $640 for at least a few months. Currently, the processor is selling for $630. Everything else is identical, including the 36MB of L3 cache, 32MB of L2 cache, and 253 watts of maximum turbo power. It’s a shame there wasn’t at least a bump to cache, especially with AMD’s 3D V-Cache processors still dominating gaming charts. There would likely be a better incentive to spend up for the Core i9-14900K in that case.

Those are the weakest tests for the Core i9-14900K, however. In a transcoding test like Handbrake, the Core i9-14900K managed to finish the task 8% faster than the Core i9-13900K. That’s likely the higher boost clock speed at work. It’s not a massive improvement, but the extra boost might be worth it if you do a lot of video editing.

That’s the biggest problem for the Core i9-14900K. It shows some improvements, but not in the areas where it matters most. For instance, in PugetBench for Photoshop, the Core i9-14900K posted almost identical numbers to the Core i9-13900K.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

DigitalTrends /  🏆 95. in US

Singapore Latest News, Singapore Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Intel Core i9-14900K Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D And Core i9-13900K: Which Should You Buy?Intel Core i9-14900K Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D And Core i9-13900K: Which Should You Buy?I cover the latest PC hardware from the likes of AMD, Intel and Nvidia, including launches of the latest graphics card processors with my own benchmarks as well as covering the latest news and trends
Read more »

Intel Core i9-14900K and Core i5-14600K review: a solid stopgapIntel Core i9-14900K and Core i5-14600K review: a solid stopgapIntel's new Core i9-14900K and Core i5-14600K close the gap with the competition from AMD, but they provide little reason to jump ship.
Read more »

Intel Core i5-14600K Review: Better Than AMD’s Ryzen 7 7800X3D And Core i5-13600K?Intel Core i5-14600K Review: Better Than AMD’s Ryzen 7 7800X3D And Core i5-13600K?I cover the latest PC hardware from the likes of AMD, Intel and Nvidia, including launches of the latest graphics card processors with my own benchmarks as well as covering the latest news and trends
Read more »

Today marks the end of an era for IntelToday marks the end of an era for IntelAfter 15 years with the same branding, the launch of the Core i9-14900K and Core i5-14600K mark the end of an era for Intel.
Read more »

Intel Core i5-14600K vs. Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Which CPU should you buy?Intel Core i5-14600K vs. Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Which CPU should you buy?AMD's Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the best gaming CPU right now, but can Intel's new Core i5-14600K be a better, more well-rounded option? Find out inside!
Read more »

Intel hits 6GHz (again) with its 14th-gen desktop CPUsIntel hits 6GHz (again) with its 14th-gen desktop CPUsIntel's 14th-gen desktop CPUs will hit 6GHz, just like its fastest 13th-gen chip.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-08-21 07:27:33