A Singapore magistrate ruled in favor of a night-shift nurse who sued her landlord over a dispute about daytime air-conditioner use, harassment, and the withholding of a security deposit. The landlord's repeated failure to attend court hearings and questionable medical excuses led the tribunal to dismiss her attempt to overturn the judgment.
A dispute over daytime use of an air-conditioner escalated into harassment, an early termination of the tenancy and, eventually, hearings at the Small Claims Tribunals.
SINGAPORE - A night-shift nurse who rented a room in an HDB flat won a claim against her landlord after a dispute over daytime use of an air-conditioner escalated into harassment, an early termination of the tenancy and, eventually, hearings at the Small Claims Tribunals (SCT). The landlord was ordered to pay the nurse $1,536.47, including an $800 security deposit that she had withheld.
The landlord later tried to set aside the judgment after repeatedly failing to attend court hearings, but Tribunal Magistrate Leon Abraham Tan dismissed the application, finding that she had deliberately stayed away despite being given multiple opportunities to appear. In grounds of decision released on July 7, the magistrate criticised what he described as the landlord's "airy disregard" for court dates, and said her conduct reflected "a conspicuous lack of respect for the judicial process".
The dispute arose after the Malaysian nurse rented a common bedroom in the five-room HDB flat from September 2024 under a one-year tenancy agreement. She shared the flat with another Malaysian nurse, who was also her friend. Each occupied a common bedroom, while the landlord's daughter and her husband occupied the master bedroom.
Because both nurses worked rotating night shifts at a public hospital, they negotiated a term in their tenancy agreements that allowed them to use the air-conditioner for up to eight hours a day regardless of the time of day. This differed from the usual arrangement in room rental agreements, which typically restrict air-conditioning use to the night.
"It was a practical arrangement that made good sense for someone who needed to sleep during the day after a night shift," the magistrate wrote. According to the judgment, the daughter complained that although each tenant stayed within her individual eight-hour daily limit, they worked different shifts.
As a result, the air-conditioning compressor sometimes ran for up to 16 hours a day because one nurse was sleeping during the day while the other slept at night. The daughter also frequently harassed the tenants by shouting at them in common areas and disrupting their sleep by switching off the air-conditioner's main power supply. The dispute reached a breaking point on Nov 1, 2024, when there was a heated discussion between the nurses and the daughter.
The daughter then presented the tenants with three options: They could increase their monthly rent from $800 to $1,000 and continue using the air-conditioner during the day, keep paying $800 but use the air-conditioner only between 11pm and 7am, or move out. If they refused to choose, the daughter threatened to "harass them daily until they did", the judgment said. After they moved out, the landlord withheld both tenants' $800 security deposits, prompting separate claims in the SCT.
In that case, the landlord counterclaimed for alleged damage to a bed frame, claiming the tenant was "very big and heavy and plump" and estimating that she weighed about 150kg. The present case became unusual because of what happened after the nurse filed her claim. Both the nurse and the landlord represented themselves at the tribunal. The landlord failed to attend the first trial date in August 2025, claiming she had fractured her leg.
Although the medical certificate she submitted did not meet court requirements, the magistrate nevertheless adjourned the hearing to give her another opportunity to attend. After hearing evidence from the nurse and her witness, the tribunal decided in the nurse's favour. But a week later, the landlord applied to have the judgment set aside, saying she had broken bones, was unable to walk and had unsuccessfully requested that the hearing be conducted over Zoom.
He found that the landlord knew about the hearing date, had repeatedly been told what type of medical certificate was required to excuse attendance, and had failed to produce one.
"It was more likely than not that she was physically able to attend the trial... but chose not to," he wrote. "The irresistible inference was that the (landlord) was selective in her attendance of judicial proceedings - present when it suited her, and absent when it did not. " The magistrate also rejected the landlord's explanation that she did not know how to obtain a medical certificate excusing her from court attendance.
When asked why she had not done so, she told the tribunal: "Every time I do not know how to tell the doctor this. It is just an MC issued by a doctor and I don't know how to say that I was unable to walk. I don't know how to tell the doctor that I was required to attend court proceedings. I don't know everything.
" The magistrate found the explanation "rings hollow", noting that she had been able to explain exactly those points during the hearing
Please follow us on Google to support usSingapore Landlord-Tenant Dispute Small Claims Tribunals Air-Conditioner Use Harassment Security Deposit Court Attendance Medical Certificate Nurse HDB Flat
Singapore Latest News, Singapore Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Singapore Records Highest Weekly Dengue Cases for 2025, Yet Below Recent Years' LevelsSingapore reported its highest weekly dengue case count for 2025 in the week ending July, with 131 infections. However, this remains lower than weekly numbers from 2022 through 2024. The largest active cluster, around Countryside Road and Lentor Avenue, has 135 cases total, 46 from the past two weeks. NEA inspections found 86 mosquito breeding habitats in that cluster, mostly inside homes.
Read more »
Workers' Party questions Singapore's port expansion, NOL sale, and autonomous vehicle rolloutDuring a six-hour parliamentary debate, Workers' Party MPs raised concerns about Singapore's reliance on physical infrastructure for transport, citing risks from evolving global trade patterns, the 2016 sale of Neptune Orient Lines, and the pace of autonomous vehicle adoption. MP Gerald Giam warned that mega projects like T5 and Tuas Port could become a fiscal drag if shipping volumes decline due to new routes or competition, emphasizing the need for digital infrastructure alongside physical assets.
Read more »
Health ministry unveils homegrown AI model built for patientsSingapore's Ministry of Health has launched Singapore Medical Foundation AI Model (SIMFONI).
Read more »
Nurse Wins Small Claims Case Against Landlord Over Air-Conditioner Dispute and HarassmentA night-shift nurse successfully claimed against her landlord after a disagreement over daytime air-conditioner use led to harassment, an early termination of the tenancy, and hearings at the Small Claims Tribunals.
Read more »