Scholars warn that DOJ’s declaration that the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional could impact other administrations.
The Trump administration’s abrupt declaration that the federal law governing presidential records for the past 48 years is unconstitutional is creating confusion about access to records of past presidencies, including documents that are on the verge of public release.
, appears intended to give President Donald Trump the legal leeway to destroy White House records from his current term. It also gives him legal backing to refuse to hand over any remaining records to the National Archives and Records Administration when he leaves office in 2029. However, Archives personnel rely on the records law daily to review, redact and make public the documents and digital records of every president since Ronald Reagan. Since Office of Legal Counsel opinions are typically treated as binding throughout the executive branch, the legal framework archivists have followed for decades is now in doubt.“The OLC opinion potentially opens a can of worms for NARA in terms of how it will proceed to open presidential records from past administrations,” said Jason R. Baron, former litigation director for the Archives. “If the Trump Justice Department takes the position that the OLC opinion applies retroactively, we might see NARA being forced to declare that records of past administrations covered by the PRA should always have been considered ‘personal’ in nature, and that courts are without jurisdiction to entertain lawsuits … for access to those records,” Baron added. That could block public access to more than 700 million White House emails, among countless other records, in Archives possession since the law went into effect in 1978, Baron said. The White House did not respond to questions about access to records from Trump's prior term, but spokesperson Abigail Jackson said Trump "is committed to preserving records from his historic Administration and he will maintain a rigorous records retention program.""The President will also retain the program currently in place for electronic records — emails and documents cannot be deleted from the White House system," Jackson added.The impact of the Justice Department opinion could be felt quickly by historians, scholars and journalists who regularly access presidential records and make requests for their release. The opinion landed as more than 78,000 pages of records from President Bill Clinton’s administration were set to be opened to the public on Friday, according toWhite House records typically begin to trickle out five years after a president leaves office, when the Archives begins accepting public requests for them. Due to backlogs and a provision in the law that lets presidents withhold some sensitive advice for 12 years after they leave office, the flow of records often begins to pick up in earnest a decade or more after their term ends. The Clinton-era records set for release this week include details of deliberations on potential federal appeals court nominees, foreign-investment reviews, the Bosnia conflict, attorney Roy Cohn, businessman Adnan Khashoggi and the Council on American-Islamic Relations. An official at the Clinton Library in Little Rock said those records were made available as planned. An Archives web page that details forthcoming records releases shows more than a dozen batches of presidential and vice presidential records set to be made public in the coming months. The new legal opinion makes it unclear whether those openings will go forward and whether archivists will continue to add new batches for release. It’s also uncertain whether the Archives will continue to accept requests from the public for presidential records created since the Presidential Records Act kicked in with Reagan’s files almost a half century ago.that the Archives received more than 200 requests for White House records from Trump’s first term after the legal window for such requests opened on Jan. 20. The future of those requests now appears to be up in the air. So far, Archives management hasn’t distributed internal guidance about how to interpret the OLC memo or how it will affect Archives policies, according to a person familiar with presidential records processing, who was granted anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter. Lawyers involved in discussions about the new legal opinion expect litigation challenging it to be filed within days. DOJ’s pronouncement could also roil pending lawsuits against the agency, including long-running lawsuits for Obama-era records and cases filed in recent months challenging the handling of requests for first-term Trump records. Kelly McClanahan, a lawyer pursuing several lawsuits seeking copies of records Trump took to Mar-a-Lago during his first term and the White House’s handling of several national security-related controversies, said he was incensed by the new opinion and fears the administration could begin to destroy records at any time.“He can tell them he wants them to shred anything he doesn’t want them to have,” McClanahan said. “I will be taking immediate steps in those cases to get this in front of a judge. This a gross mischaracterization not only of the statute itself but of the entire concept of separation of powers.” The 52-page OLC opinion, authored by Assistant Attorney General T. Elliot Gaiser, immediately drew criticism from various quarters. While such opinions typically interpret Supreme Court precedent, Gaiser’s memo flatly declares that a key high court ruling involving President Richard Nixon’s records is erroneous.Meanwhile, historians are crying foul over a move they say upset the balance Congress struck in 1978, declaring presidential records to be federal property, but allowing a period of confidentiality that leads to eventual public access.“The preservation of these records, both current, past and future, are all essential to democratic processes that depend upon appropriate public scrutiny,” said Sarah Weicksel of the American Historical Association. Weicksel also said it’s possible the administration was focused solely on giving Trump more flexibility and hasn’t thought through the ramifications of simply abandoning the presidential records law.
White House Justice Department Presidential Records Presidential Records Act OLC The Trump Public Access Opinion Office Of Legal Counsel
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
US crude jumps more than 11%, Brent nearly 8% after Trump vows more attacks on IranHOUSTON - US oil prices settled more than 11 per cent higher and Brent soared nearly eight per cent on Thursday (April 2) in volatile trading, as traders worried about prolonged disruptions to oil supply the day after President Donald Trump said the United States would continue attacks on Iran.Brent crude futures closed US$7.87 (S$10.10), or 7.
Read more »
Trump's fresh Iran threats give investors a risk-off reality checkUS President Donald Trump's threat to bomb Iran 'back to the Stone Age' has sharply raised stakes in a war now in its fifth week, a setback to investors hoping for a swift end to a conflict that is squeezing oil supplies and fanning inflation.Global markets recoiled early on Thursday (April 2), with stocks and bond prices sliding, oil surging...
Read more »
Trump tariffs: South Korea says simplified US metal levy system will ease calculation burdenSouth Korea's trade ministry says the Trump administration's adjusted levies on metals will likely ease the burden its companies have been facing in calculating duties. But the country's home appliance makers are reportedly worried about profitability.
Read more »
Trump's 2027 Budget Proposal Focuses on Defense, Cuts Non-Defense SpendingPresident Donald Trump's proposed budget for fiscal year 2027 prioritizes a significant increase in defense spending to $1.5 trillion, while reducing spending on non-defense programs. The plan aims to shift some responsibilities to state and local governments and includes funding for immigration enforcement and Justice Department initiatives. The proposal reflects the administration's values and priorities, but Congress will ultimately decide the final budget.
Read more »
Trump administration proposes expanding Chinese tech gear crackdownWASHINGTON – The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on Friday (April 3) proposed to ban the import of Chinese equipment from a group of manufacturers after previously barring approvals of new models in 2022, the latest move by Washington to crack down on Chinese-made electronic gear.
Read more »
‘This is a recalibration’: Trump Cabinet worries no one is safe after Bondi and Noem firingsWhen President Donald Trump ousted his attorney general, Pam Bondi, it sent a clear message to his remaining Cabinet members: The job security they’ve...
Read more »